Comparison Review: Tested: Hyundai i45 ELITE v Mazda6 Classic v Suzuki Kizashi XLS v Volkswagen Jetta 118 TSI

Despite its unarguable improvement compared with its predecessor, the Hyundai’s dynamic flaws consign it to the back of this impressive pack.

Before we get a bunch of blog comments moaning about motoring writers getting their priorities wrong and only being interested in going fast around corners, what we’re talking about here is fundamental, primary safety.

The more control you have of your car, the safer you are. You may never be called on to make an emergency manoeuvre (we all hope for that), but if you do, then you want the steering and the handling to be as good as possible.

Simply, the i45 should be better. It’s a real pity because, otherwise, this car is a significant step forward.

The Kizashi drops out next, ticked off the list because of its grumbly ride, slightly cramped rear seat, small boot and – on this test at least – poor fuel consumption. For a first-up effort, it is commendable and competitive but not class-leading.

So to the two veterans. The Mazda has space, style and a quite exceptional ride and handling combination. The Jetta’s drivetrain is the best here by a fair margin; it’s also the quietest and most comfortable car, confident to drive and well-priced.

On the downside, the Mazda is noisy and the Jetta’s rear-seat space is cramped.

It’s a close call but the VW’s cutting-edge technology hands it the high ground. That’s quite an achievement considering the Jetta is nearing retirement, with a new generation due next year.

The Mazda is a handy alternate choice if you need the room. Either way, your happy medium awaits.

– , . , , .

Related Posts

Leave a comment

0 Comments.

Leave a Reply


[ Ctrl + Enter ]

Your Ad Here